Re:Doctor: ADHD, as currently defined, does not exist
by Pxtl on Monday March 17, 2014 @02:31PM
(#7417026)
Imagine reading an article on punctuated equilibrium with the headline "Darwin is Wrong". Technically true, but WTF? Or a discussion of potential side-effects of the H1N1 vaccine with the headline "Vaccines Kill People".
Just because it's true doesn't mean you don't need some tact.
Also, I notice you've assumed I'm a sufferer. You might want to put away the "jump to conclusions mat" and maybe just try having a little empathy?
Re:Doctor: ADHD, as currently defined, does not exist
by pessimizer on Monday March 17, 2014 @03:31PM
(#7417477)
>Also, I notice you've assumed I'm a sufferer.
Where did you notice that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_transparency
Re:Doctor: ADHD, as currently defined, does not exist
by darkarmani on Monday March 17, 2014 @04:51PM
(#7418018)
> As long as an attack on bad science
The bad science is this book that pretends to have evidence on its side.
As long as an attack on bad science continues to be interpreted by a segment of sufferers as a personal attack, sufferers groups will never exist as anything other than tools for drug companies to subvert the scientific process.