News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin... by logicchains on Sunday March 16, 2014 @08:44AM (#7409240)
Hmm. I suppose that's a disadvantage of having a less formal code-review process, compared to one in which the reverter would have to specify a reason for each reversion, making it easier to detect spurious reversions.
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin... by greenrd on Sunday March 16, 2014 @11:18AM (#7409687)
You'd think that a site like GitHub would have mandated code review for all commits by now. Especially after that time a few years ago when they managed to accidentally delete all the pull requests in the entire site, or something like that!

Wait, they're a ruby shop, they don't even believe in letting the compiler help you avoid making basic mistakes. dons flame-retardant suit

Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin... by couchand on Sunday March 16, 2014 @01:32PM (#7410326)
It should be obvious that that's a false equality.