Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by lancewiggs on Sunday March 16, 2014 @04:29AM
(#7408598)
It's not what or whether they were watching, it's how they were watching. It's a judgement call but pretty easy to tell if a group is leering or just watching friends have fun.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by peterjancelis on Sunday March 16, 2014 @05:04AM
(#7408702)
Even more so, it is the sexual attractiveness of the guys who are watching.
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by chii on Sunday March 16, 2014 @06:23AM
(#7408903)
are you implying that if it had been an attractive male watching the females, there wouldn't have been any complaint, despite being leered at?
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by brazzy on Sunday March 16, 2014 @07:26AM
(#7409043)
Yes, that's what is being implied, and it's certainly something that happens, in degrees. People generally enjoy attention from those they themselves find attractive - obviously up to a limit, but that limit is much different than when you don't find the other person attractive.
And that is why the "making a woman feel uncomfortable constitutes sexual harassment" standard is problematic. And of course it's not entirely wrong either because it certainly can be done on purpose.
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by RivieraKid on Sunday March 16, 2014 @07:55AM
(#7409113)
Not by the hula hoopers
Re:Julie Ann Horvath Describes Sexism and Intimidation Behin...
by microjesus on Sunday March 16, 2014 @12:07PM
(#7409920)
What really concerns me; is why she was watching them watch.