Re:Consider the Nimrod Programming Language
by MetaCosm on Thursday March 13, 2014 @11:57AM
(#7392647)
I disagree. I know most Go shops I have dealt with at least have looked into gccgo. We use gccgo in the wild (for all our image processing components), because it gave us a nice performance boost. With good testing, you can easily do A/B testing using gccgo to see where it makes sense for you in production.
We have to dig through 30TB of images -- so the performance benefits we got from gccgo were worth the trivial effort it took to implement.
gccgo has too many issues (lags behind release, requires gcc recompile, etc.) to be useful to most people.