News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung Galaxy Back-door by tlrobinson on Thursday March 13, 2014 @12:21AM (#7390031)
Trusting compiled software isn't a big deal with digitally signed deterministic builds like Bitcoin and Tor are starting to do (http://gitian.org/)

Unfortunately it's a huge pain to do with existing toolchains.

Re:Samsung Galaxy Back-door by kansface on Friday March 14, 2014 @08:22PM (#7402869)
How do deterministic builds address exploits compiled into the compiler itself?
Re:Samsung Galaxy Back-door by tlrobinson on Friday March 14, 2014 @11:28PM (#7403352)
Ah yes, the Ken Thompson hack. It's possible in theory, but I don't think anyone is seriously worried about it.

One way to mitigate the attack: if your compiler is open source you could compile the compiler with multiple (open source and proprietary) compilers, then compile your application code using the resulting compiler binaries in the deterministic build process. If the resulting application binaries match, then either none of the compilers are compromised, or all of them are. The latter seems highly unlikely.

Also, open source software compiled by the user would be just as vulnerable.