Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by ericd on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @07:14PM
(#7382855)
Ah, good to know! Makes a lot of sense. Do you know if it actually does reduce emissions?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by cwal37 on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @11:14AM
(#7386037)
It does. Just at a very basic level they're reducing the amount of smog-producing particulates and toxins such as benzene in the typical gallon of gas. Obviously, a reduction in those constituents is going to affect their ratios in the combustion products, it's like reducing the number of moles on the left side of a balanced chemical equation. The moles on the right are going to drop because there's less material.
California has an interesting history with environmental legislation, as it had a clean air board before the EPA existed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Air_Resources_Board
Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by saryant on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @07:17PM
(#7382864)
I don't know.
This is actually one area where the refining industry wants federal regulation: they would vastly prefer to deal with a single set of standards for the whole country than tailoring individual plants to 50 different standards.
Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by maxerickson on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @07:24PM
(#7382905)
There are minimum federal standards:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/gasolinefuels/rfg/areas.htm
So the state specific requirements only really matter if they exceed the federal standards.
It's pretty likely that reformulated gasoline is effective in reducing smog (I think CO is the big target).
Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by saryant on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @07:26PM
(#7382915)
> So the state specific requirements only really matter if they exceed the federal standards.
Which is exactly the case in California, hence the higher prices.
Re:Tesla Faces New Jersey Challenge as Rule Change Looms
by maxerickson on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @08:24PM
(#7383157)
To a large extent, I was replying to your wording. There is federal regulation. I was probably over-reading.