News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Evicted in San Francisco. Parent comment

Re:Evicted in San Francisco by nilkn on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @05:37PM (#7382339)
> so as long as the unit was legal

It wasn't, according to this article. She took a risk.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evicted in San Francisco by radley on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @05:51PM (#7382424)
What if she was just "renting a room" and the new owner simply labelled it an "inlaw" as a legal loophole?

[Update] I didn't see the pic. Yeah, it's clearly in a different building, so an in-law.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evicted in San Francisco by CocaKoala on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @06:07PM (#7382525)
Saying that if you change the details of a story, then the details are different doesn't actually mean anything and doesn't have any bearing on the story as it happened.
[ Parent | on HN ]