News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Expects Google Voice App Developers To Pay Refunds ... by mechanical_fish on Sunday August 02, 2009 @01:10PM (#737700)
Society recognizes the fact that some things are simply too morally wrong to be allowed.

I don't know what society you live in. But my society has Wal-Mart in it.

You think those Wal-Mart folks would hesitate to drop your product from their shelves without giving you a reason? You think they are shy about making their suppliers sign a scary one-sided contract and then holding them to it?

And the App Store is not made from Soylent Green. In the grand list of potentially unfair business practices I doubt this even rates. Compared to what the music industry does to bands every single day, this contract is sunshine and birdsong.

Alas, if you don't like Apple's contract terms you're stuck doing business with their competitors. Fortunately, they're easy to find. One of them is probably clinging to your leg right now.

Re:Apple Expects Google Voice App Developers To Pay Refunds ... by TomOfTTB on Sunday August 02, 2009 @01:24PM (#737718)
Are you a John Mayer fan? I ask because that “Waiting for the World To Change” song has always bugged the heck out of me. I mean, DUDE, you’re a 30 year old millionaire celebrity whining about how you’re powerless to do anything? Come on.

Society is what we make of it and the worst possible excuse for letting an injustice go is because “it’s not like there aren’t other injustices in the world” Also, I think you are unfair to Walmart. I’ve heard of Walmart making almost unreal requirements of their vendors (include little tools with things that need to be assembled, adopt RFID without a price increase, etc…) But in each of those cases they actually MADE A DEMAND. Apple’s not even making demands here they’re just kicking apps to the curb with no explanation.

(You’re probably also being a little unfair to the record companies but that would lead to a debate of what they actually provide to artists and this really isn’t the place)

Re:Apple Expects Google Voice App Developers To Pay Refunds ... by mechanical_fish on Sunday August 02, 2009 @02:06PM (#737794)
I'm not trying to excuse Apple. I'm just suggesting that the standards of "morality" in American business certainly encompass tying people to one-sided contracts and then taking advantage of them. That happens all the time.

So if your plan of action involves convincing anyone but a diehard geek that Apple's actions rise to the level of moral injustice... we've got a lot of work to do. There are a lot of people crying "moral injustice". We'll have to stand in line.

Re:Apple Expects Google Voice App Developers To Pay Refunds ... by jsz0 on Sunday August 02, 2009 @01:41PM (#737744)
The Wal-Mart analogy is perfect. Works on so many levels.
Re:Apple Expects Google Voice App Developers To Pay Refunds ... by fatdog789 on Sunday August 02, 2009 @02:27PM (#737846)
You think those Wal-Mart folks would hesitate to drop your product from their shelves without giving you a reason? You think they are shy about making their suppliers sign a scary one-sided contract and then holding them to it?

Actually, yes I do hesitate. WalMart makes its demands up front. You know exactly what you're getting into when you sign with Walmart. It doesn't change its behavior after you've signed the contract, or make capricious decisions. If something needs to change, Walmart lets the supplier know, and why it needs to change, and how it needs to change. Apple doesn't even give you an email.