News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by _random_ on Monday March 10, 2014 @02:28PM (#7374752)
It's funny: I was betting on WPF at the time but it seems dead now, with only some XAML knowledge transferable. Still have to do JS, but at least Angular doesn't suck too much.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by nawitus on Monday March 10, 2014 @05:41PM (#7375874)
Here's a tip: never bet on something proprietary.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by jussij on Monday March 10, 2014 @09:02PM (#7376783)
Here's my 20+ years of experience working as a contract in Australia.

In all that time I've only ever worked with proprietary tools and have never had trouble getting high paying contract work.

I would say I've done very well betting on something proprietary.

Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by hkarthik on Monday March 10, 2014 @10:09PM (#7377014)
Parent comment had to be qualified a bit: Never bet on anything proprietary which doesn't offer significant advantages over non-proprietary competitors.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by nextw33k on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @05:36AM (#7378221)
Sliverlight would be a great example of that.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by gaius on Friday March 14, 2014 @01:57PM (#7400597)
LOL. I know guys who have worked the last 20 years on Oracle, and they'll have no trouble finding work for 20 more. The same for Visual C++. Or a whole host of other things. The world isn't as simple as GNU ideology would have you believe.
Re:Ask HN: What happens to older developers? by roel_v on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @06:01AM (#7378312)
Yeah, like that article from yesterday about the Perl6 guys doubling down because in 18 months when Perl6 was done, the speaking/writing/consulting gravy train was coming...