News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tokyo Radiation Less Than Paris’s Three Years After Meltdown by pessimizer on Monday March 10, 2014 @01:46PM (#7374447)
>There are good arguments that low doses are handled by the cell's mutation correction mechanisms in a way that cannot be done for high doses.

Might be better to present those arguments, or links to those arguments. The argument that scientific opinion isn't settled, but there may be a magic number that has to be reached within a short period of time for exposure to be dangerous sounds like pro-nuclear FUD, whether it is or not.

Re:Tokyo Radiation Less Than Paris’s Three Years After Meltdown by chc on Monday March 10, 2014 @05:12PM (#7375723)
I don't think the statement "There are good arguments that this is not harmful" could reasonably be described as "fear, uncertainty and doubt."