News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by ScottWhigham on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:01PM (#7373671)
That doesn't make it acceptable for you to completely ignore their copyright on that material.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by rhizome on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:39PM (#7373952)
It does, however, make it inevitable that it would happen.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by icebraining on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:17PM (#7373778)
I agree, it's not the paywall that makes it acceptable.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by res0nat0r on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:32PM (#7373910)
"Information wants to be free" doesn't justify that you should ignore their copyright just because you can easily ignore their paywall with little consequence to yourself.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by icebraining on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:40PM (#7373957)
I agree, the paywall being easy to ignore with little consequence to oneself is not what justifies ignoring their copyright.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by res0nat0r on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:49PM (#7374017)
Ah, is this one of those things were copyrights don't matter since you aren't a musician, director, writer, etc? And software should be paid for? Or if you open source your work then there is no problem me incorporating that into my closed source project, since copyright doesn't matter?
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by icebraining on Monday March 10, 2014 @01:13PM (#7374201)
I don't want to pollute this thread with an offtopic discussion. If you want to talk about it feel free to send me an email, it's on my profile.
Re:Mt. Gox Files for Bankruptcy in U.S by sodastream on Monday March 10, 2014 @01:13PM (#7374202)
That would be fine if there was no copyright.

GPL use is only useful as long as copyright exist: should it not exist then GPL is not just not useful anymore but not needed at all!

I'd just disassemble what you did and release it as open source again :D