News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tokyo Radiation Less Than Paris’s Three Years After Meltdown. Parent comment

Re:Tokyo Radiation Less Than Paris’s Three Years After Meltdown by cjslep on Monday March 10, 2014 @12:01PM (#7373666)
As a person formally trained in Nuclear Engineering, I am curious as to what relevant truths you are seeking to know that the "standard operating procedure" tells me we should be hiding.

I'm all for constructive debates on nuclear power generation, but I do want to point out that the snark is making it difficult for me to want to even try to engage you in a dialogue.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tokyo Radiation Less Than Paris’s Three Years After Meltdown by userulluipeste on Tuesday March 11, 2014 @06:30AM (#7378393)
Well, what was then the "standard operating procedure" in dealing with all that radioactive waste? No, I'm not asking for quoted texts by the book for how things should go when everything's OK, I'm interested more in how a large scale contamination should be (or should have been) dealt with? That, if there ever was such an assumed scenario after Chernobyl, of course...
[ Parent | on HN ]