> you have to admit the cryptography sphere has been dominated by the recent Satoshi Nakamoto debacle
No, I don't agree. I'm doing a PhD in the field of crypto, follow multiple mailing lists related to my field, watch for the new papers arriving on the IACR ePrint [1], follow many blogs and subreddits… and I can assure you the real crypto sphere don't give a damn about "the recent Satoshi Nakamoto debacle". Bitcoin enthusiasts do, however.
[1] http://eprint.iacr.org/ (btw, this is a very good source of security related original content).
PS: in your "what is this" at the top of the page you are not consistent with "r/subreddit" and "/r/subreddit" (leading '/'), you should fix that.
You're right, the site is heavily targeted towards cryptocurrencies, but my goal is to keep it filled with more of the high level talk surrounding cryptocurrencies. The articles about the search for Satoshi were a poor choice to list on the frontpage, I agree. Consdering there was next to no evidence in any of them.
I have just made a note to look for more information on http://eprint.iacr.org/ daily, and the /r/funny inconsistency has been changed to r/funny.
I must admit (if it wasn't obvious from my username) that I am primarily a Bitcoin fan. I posted the resources I know best about to the library.php page because I want it to be accurate.
You can now find eprint.iacr.org and iacr.org in the library under the Cryptography heading ;) (And I must say, I found it humorous that iacr.org does not employ TLS)
Again, I really appreciate your comments. Thank you for taking the time to look through the site. I wish you the best of luck in completing your PhD.
My apologies for pre-populating the site with some articles and upvotes. I read that's how reddit got started so I figured I would give it a try.
I first submit Cryptanalys.is to HN a few days ago with just 8 posts from myself and no extra upvotes, and it didn't get a single pageview: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7339368
So yes most of the stories and karma values on there are not submit by real people... yet. Here's to hoping.
If you have any ideas on sources for better/more-interesting information I would love to hear them.
I appreciate your taking a look at the website.