News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feminist Frequency steals artwork, refuses to credit owner. by leephillips on Friday March 07, 2014 @10:28AM (#7360729)
Statutory damages for willful copyright infringement go up to $150,000 per offense. Instead of complaining to a content thief who obviously doesn't care, the artist should be looking for a lawyer interested in taking this on for a cut. Then the donors to the kickstarter will at least know where their money went.
Re:Feminist Frequency steals artwork, refuses to credit owner. by supersystem on Friday March 07, 2014 @11:00AM (#7360935)
Except that it doesn't seem to be original work. So how are you going to maintain that your derivative work was fair use, which relies on being non-commercial, while suing someone for damages? Especially when the one who "stole" your work seems to have a better case for fair use.
Re:Feminist Frequency steals artwork, refuses to credit owner. by leephillips on Friday March 07, 2014 @11:16AM (#7361023)
"it doesn't seem to be original work"

You mean it's a depiction of an existing character from a game or something. That doesn't mean that it's not original artwork. I'm sure that would be a relevant issue in court, but that's why we have trials.

"which relies on being non-commercial"

As other posters here have pointed out, this is not true.

Re:Feminist Frequency steals artwork, refuses to credit owner. by chrismcb on Saturday March 08, 2014 @02:16AM (#7364517)
Her derivative work is not fair use. So she doesn't need to argue that. And the other person has NO case of fair use.