Re:FCC Takes On Apple And AT&T Over Google Voice Rejection
by keltex on Friday July 31, 2009 @08:00PM
(#735709)
I'm curious what jurisdiction the FCC has over Apple (other than clearing the devices for interference). AT & T I can understand. Anybody know?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC Takes On Apple And AT&T Over Google Voice Rejection
by rosser on Friday July 31, 2009 @08:11PM
(#735727)
Apple is manufacturing and selling telecommunications devices. That being the case, the FCC's purview extends well beyond simply clearing the devices for interference. That's the standard a device is held to if it may emit EM radiation, but that emission is not meant for communications purposes, AIUI. The bar is set rather higher, and the FCC's powers rather deeper, if the EM spectrum the devices emit on is actually meant to be used for communicative purposes -- particularly if it uses a licensed band.
Disclaimer: IANAFCCW (I am not an FCC wonk.)
Re:FCC Takes On Apple And AT&T Over Google Voice Rejection
by lutorm on Saturday August 01, 2009 @03:54AM
(#736112)
Is this a fair shortening of your comment:
Because Apple sells devices that use the public airwaves, they are subject to regulation, and the agency in charge of that is the FCC?
Re:FCC Takes On Apple And AT&T Over Google Voice Rejection
by jrockway on Friday July 31, 2009 @08:36PM
(#735761)
There are no legal proceedings, the FCC is just asking so it can have the full story. If AT&T is leaning on Apple, then it is possible that AT&T is illegally using the radio spectrum we licensed to them. They need to know what's going on, though; they don't want to guess.
Re:FCC Takes On Apple And AT&T Over Google Voice Rejection
by dtf on Saturday August 01, 2009 @04:32AM
(#736134)
You've hit the nail on the head. It's not what Apple's doing - it's what the carriers may be doing. Given the way the carrier market works at the moment, consumers do deserve competition protection. The FCC is quite right to stick its oar in here, even it it's only to say "hey guys, I'm watching you".