Yeah, the article covers that pretty early on. Turns out that's actually not why 1 hasn't been prime for most of human history, though.
Actually read the article to find the answer!
Re:On Primes and Pluto
by shittyanalogy on Friday March 07, 2014 @08:12AM
(#7359955)
I did read the article.
Prime is a word not a fact of the universe, just like Planet is a word and not a fact of the universe. Those words, unlike most words, have definitions put in place by authorities. The authorities might change the definitions over time as a new definition's usefulness exceeds that of an old definition.
Practically:
It's more useful to think of primes and planets as not including their recent ex-members than it is to include them.