News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Face Behind Bitcoin? by baddox on Thursday March 06, 2014 @02:20PM (#7355939)
> In fact, there's only one case where I can find working for the government while thinking it shouldn't exist is workable, and that's working for the government in a capacity where you can dismantle the government. Which is often what happens right?

Where do you draw the line? What about using tax-funded roads, or regulated industries like air travel?

Re:The Face Behind Bitcoin? by bane on Thursday March 06, 2014 @09:55PM (#7358260)
It doesn't mean I agree with that method. But it's at least internally consistent and I can respect the ideology and politics from it.

I happily think that my taxes help buy the civilization I enjoy. I actually believe the concept that government is not some impersonal monolithic bureaucracy, but is what Lincoln enshrined as "by the people, of the people and for the people".

When the IRS makes a mistake and gives me a hard time I don't think "GODDAMN IMPERSONAL IRS SCREW THE GOVERNMENT", I think "some poor schlep looking at tax returns all day screwed up." I think this might come from the area I grew up and live in, where practically every 4th or 5th person I know is employed in some capacity by the Federal government. So I personalize what it is and understand that it's not a mechanized black box.

Re:The Face Behind Bitcoin? by baddox on Friday March 07, 2014 @01:58PM (#7361997)
> I actually believe the concept that government is not some impersonal monolithic bureaucracy, but is what Lincoln enshrined as "by the people, of the people and for the people".

In my view, that is either an untestable (and therefore essentially meaningless) hypothesis, or it's a testable hypothesis that fails nearly every test.