And just because you don't know whether Nakamoto suffered & acted on such cognitive dissonance doesn't justify posting outrageous examples of what you're imputing.
In fact my original post is questioning why examples like this are so common.
If really pressed, I suppose I could go through my FB friend's walls anonymize and take screenshots of the thousands upon thousands of posts by Government workers and contractors I know who endlessly post things similar to my example. But I'm not sure I should spend my time trying to make you aware of a phenomenon that's plainly obvious for anybody to see.
Our definitions differ. I'm going with "very bad or wrong in a way that causes anger; too bad to be accepted or allowed; going beyond all standards of what is right or decent; deficient in propriety or good taste".
I'm aware of the phenomenon, and noted that it is plainly in abundance throughout the sociopolitical spectrum.
We actually don't know that. On the surface sure look like it, but he could have had a similar personal philosophy before during and after his time working for the government.
> We can point at ANY part of the sociopolitical spectrum and find hypocrites.
Absolutely agree. I could add also the large number of pacifist liberal vegan types I know who work for the DoD or whatever.
>Non-fing-sequitur straw-man
It's obviously not, if by your own theory his philosophy is what drove him to develop bitcoin, then it is sequitur to examine that philosophy and how it's expressed.
> I could spew the same sort of such outrageous examples about liberals/leftists/progressives/socialists
What example did I provide that was outrageous? You either don't work in or near the Fed-space and haven't come across this kind of person daily or you're living in a state of denial.