News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UK official involved in national porn filter arrested for... by astrodust on Wednesday March 05, 2014 @05:03PM (#7350273)
I completely agree. I can imagine there are those conducting research into politically sensitive subjects that could be caught up in more aggressive laws. For instance, is it illegal for police to hold images of child pornography as part of an investigation? Is it illegal for a child to have pornographic images of themselves?

Abuse of any kind, adult, child, or animal, should be investigated and prosecuted as allowed by law. The products of these acts, which could be in the hands of innumerable people for various reasons, legitimate (investigators, vigilantes, etc.) or otherwise, is something that can't be un-done, not with how the internet works.

Still, it should be important to differentiate between possession, distribution, and production in all of these cases. Any law that fails to tackle even this most fundamental concern is just plain broken, yet they get passed all the time on the emotional basis of "Think of the children!"

Re:UK official involved in national porn filter arrested for... by DanBC on Wednesday March 05, 2014 @05:11PM (#7350317)
> For instance, is it illegal for police to hold images of child pornography as part of an investigation? Is it illegal for a child to have pornographic images of themselves?

> Still, it should be important to differentiate between possession, distribution, and production in all of these cases.

Luckily the relevant law does what you want and answers your questions. You'll want to read it with the sentencing guidelines too.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents