Re:Mathematicians are chronically lost and confused
by pcmonk on Wednesday March 05, 2014 @09:52AM
(#7347223)
But could they (1) extend your results or (2) have enough of an understanding of it to apply it to their work? The benefit of a napkin explanation is that they understand it well enough to know whether it would be useful/interesting to learn the issue better. If they really want to apply your results, though, then they'll need a better understanding. It's true that math papers aren't good for giving a surface-level intro to a subject, but they're not made for that. They're made so that if someone really wants to learn the subject, then they can.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mathematicians are chronically lost and confused
by hessenwolf on Thursday March 06, 2014 @05:24AM
(#7352906)
Very valid point. I suppose I just think we could make room in scientific papers, especially in the digital age, for an explanation of how the idea came about. I spent most of my early research career trying to find out how mathematicians got their ideas in the first place, because no amount of learning mathematics seemed to teach that.