Re:Stop using Nagios (so it can die peacefully)
by blueskin_ on Tuesday March 04, 2014 @07:11PM
(#7344243)
I haven't seen this in ~1k services, but I guess it probably depends on the spec of the monitoring system to some degree, and I realise that 1k+ hosts is likely a different story. If you're using passive checks in any high-rate capacity, you should be using NSCA or increasing the frequency they are read in anyway. This is also another problem Icinga handles better - while I say Nagios for convenience's sake, my comments here refer to Icinga (and to Nagios XI, which is comparable but stupidly expensive).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.