News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Google Wave reality check by andreyf on Friday July 31, 2009 @01:38PM (#734912)
Why does nobody see past the Wave UI? Is nobody else excited by a paradigm of world-synced objects that respond to changes? Wasn't this the smalltalk dream?
Re:A Google Wave reality check by snprbob86 on Friday July 31, 2009 @01:59PM (#734971)
Without a UI which absolutely nails the execution, it won't matter at all how great the technology is.
Re:A Google Wave reality check by dpnewman on Friday July 31, 2009 @10:21AM (#734465)
Speaking personally, beyond crashing, the UI itself still needs quite a lot more shaping and thinking through. It's very busy, and somewhat complex. It's not yet something that feels elegant in purpose.

One challenge is how you blend realtime and non-realtime in the same conversation -- it's actually quite tricky a UI conundrum. The technical aspect is one thing and they have that solved architecturally, but the UI part is intriguing. For example, realtime will tend to make people communicate in small bursts back and forth which will often dampen -- when in the same conversation -- the impulse for non-realtime, more thought out responses (like you have in a threaded forum such as this).

The underlying vision of the platform is huge, and with great potential. Over time I think wave will be vital. But I think the big challenge for Google and platform developers is beyond bugs, but to hone the clients that utilize it.

Re:A Google Wave reality check by alanthonyc on Friday July 31, 2009 @06:23PM (#735542)
It's in PRE-alpha. What do they expect?
Re:A Google Wave reality check by olliesaunders on Friday July 31, 2009 @11:26PM (#735930)
"25% of sessions end in crashes" what kind of programmers are they employing there? Heard of scrum guys?