News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ... because Ruby isn't terse enough yet. Parent comment

Re:... because Ruby isn't terse enough yet by raganwald on Saturday October 27, 2007 @10:15PM (#73329)
It was actually a typo. Fixed, thank you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:... because Ruby isn't terse enough yet by mnemonicsloth on Sunday October 28, 2007 @03:36PM (#73489)
No, thank you.

I've just been forced to learn about a new language proposal, a new (to me) set of morphisms, and a nonstandard approach to proving stuff in topology. That's a rich link.

[ Parent | on HN ]