News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The sorry state of Visual Studio syntax highlighting (2012) by wila on Sunday March 02, 2014 @05:40AM (#7328633)
Post is from 2012, but still it is weird to be so inflammatory about the inabilities of customizing a specific part of syntax highlighting.

Unless you have actually written syntax highlighting code parsers yourself better as what is in Visual Studio I am of the opinion you do not have any rights to be that rude.

Re:The sorry state of Visual Studio syntax highlighting (2012) by seanmcdirmid on Sunday March 02, 2014 @05:50AM (#7328659)
I've written more than a few syntax highlighters (as well as semantic highlighters and entire IDEs based on incremental parsing and type checking). This is one of those features where eclipse is quite ahead of visual studio, but its quite a minor feature it makes sense that isn't a high priority.
Re:The sorry state of Visual Studio syntax highlighting (2012) by wila on Sunday March 02, 2014 @06:57AM (#7328817)
You're the author of the post? Can't seem to see who author "Sam" is at that blog, but I did notice that not only did the author write the complaint, but also wrote code to address his issues in a later post.

http://lolengine.net/blog/2012/12/01/announce-vslol-1.0.0.5-...

FWIW, I've worked on syntax highlighters myself and IDEs as well which is what prompted my reaction. The particular problem didn't seem to be a big enough problem for me to warrant the post. But hey.. what do I know, I'm not Sam, at least kudos to him that he actually did something about the issue he had besides writing the inflammatory post.

Re:The sorry state of Visual Studio syntax highlighting (2012) by seanmcdirmid on Sunday March 02, 2014 @07:03AM (#7328833)
Not the author of the post but have been frustrated by this before.