That article was over a year ago. Apple's stock has appreciated about 25% since.

I don't think you have much of a point here. Apple is priced on a presumption by Mr. Market that it will never have another major product line and associated high-growth revenue stream. The price has little to nothing to do with its sustainability investments, because they have no impact on its ability to create another breakthrough. (In other words, Apple's future success is clearly not due to capital constraints. Knowledge constraints are the limit.)

Apple's stock did not collapse as the article predicted. In fact it partially recovered a lot of that lost value. Even if the stock had collapsed, it would not support your original claims for all the reasons I have already given. So, I have to wonder if you have a point or if you are simply trolling.

That's almost a year old.