Re:F# 3.1 as C# 6.0 Strict Mode
by corresation on Saturday March 01, 2014 @09:58AM
(#7324388)
"but c# advocates in microsoft have been quite parasitic in their behavior of pushing the language(inside of microsoft)"
How could you possibly have decided that "parasitic" was the best word? Is C# hanging off the back of F#'s success?
Not really. .NET has succeeded to the degree it has because C# is a credible, robust, general purpose, accessible but powerful language.
This whole submission is a desperate, misled, confused attempt at elitism, and becomes particularly ridiculous when it's talking about what are trivial syntactical sugar changes.
Particularly bizarre is this confused notion that F# is being ripped off, as if there aren't many languages with most of the same rudiments.
How could you possibly have decided that "parasitic" was the best word? Is C# hanging off the back of F#'s success?
Not really. .NET has succeeded to the degree it has because C# is a credible, robust, general purpose, accessible but powerful language.
This whole submission is a desperate, misled, confused attempt at elitism, and becomes particularly ridiculous when it's talking about what are trivial syntactical sugar changes.
Particularly bizarre is this confused notion that F# is being ripped off, as if there aren't many languages with most of the same rudiments.