News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The pleasantness of Om.

Re:The pleasantness of Om by nickfargo on Friday February 28, 2014 @08:54PM (#7322738)
The "looks more pleasant?" test can be valid only between cljs/Om and the CoffeeScript from which the generated JS was compiled.

By presenting Coffee's not-quite-idiomatic JS output as the counterpoint, the otherwise well made argument for Om's pleasantness is weakened.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The pleasantness of Om by elwell on Friday February 28, 2014 @08:57PM (#7322744)
yeah, it's riddled with '_ref's and the like.
[ Parent | on HN ]