Re:An analysis of Facebook photo caching
by leapinglemur55 on Friday February 28, 2014 @03:38PM
(#7321314)
Why are they still using the FIFO policy when their own data shows that S4LRU beats it in every area? Is it just easier to implement?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An analysis of Facebook photo caching
by alexgartrell on Friday February 28, 2014 @04:04PM
(#7321485)
The short, uninteresting answer is that it's a work in progress. Initially we built FIFO into our caches because it was easy to build and didn't interact badly with flash disk craziness (write amplification specifically). You can read more about our old caching system mcdipper at https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/mcdipper...