Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by malka on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @05:54AM
(#7304120)
lots of websites do not consider the '+' character to be invalid for an email (I do not have an example in my mind at the moment). Annoying as hell.
Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by joshvm on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @08:28AM
(#7304734)
Almost all websites allow it. The ones that don't are generally fairly restrictive and probably just check is_alnum(). I use it all the time to segregate incoming mail. I have 1Password and generate a random long password for each account, so I'm not particularly concerned if one or multiple accounts are breached. This means I have to trust 1Password of course, but I'll risk it.
The problem for me is inconsistent support. For example, when validation allows it, but the server-side strips the +. I recently booked a flight with Monarch (UK super budget), email address:
This got stripped to [email protected] which I'm sure doesn't exist for my name. I couldn't change the email because.. surprise.. you need a confirmation email to do it. Fortunately you only need the booking reference and the address to check in, but it was a bit annoying.
Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by welder on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @07:05AM
(#7304374)
Then there's always [email protected]
Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by taylonr on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @09:25AM
(#7305042)
I think that there are a lot fewer people using that feature than you'd assume. Even lots of developer coworkers don't know about that ability, even fewer use it. So I can't imagine there are a lot of non-techie people out there doing [email protected].
Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by sp332 on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @10:35AM
(#7305530)
Not many, but in 360,000,000 there are probably a few.
Re:360 million newly stolen credentials on black market
by serf on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @11:07AM
(#7305712)
I thought that too, but did you take a look at the last big dump that went public? I think it was the Target one. There were tons of that type of email used. I'm not sure about the percentage, certainly less than ten percent, but when you're talking such sheer volume that does not really matter very much.
Anyone have a copy of the dump?
[1] http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/2-hidden-ways-to-get-m...