I'm having trouble understanding what you think the relevance of that might be. Obviously, when someone commits suicide, that decision ultimately rests on their shoulders and is borne of their experience/history/state/what-have-you. GP was trying to make a broader point about the difference in levels of significance between a catastrophic business fuck-up and the wasting of human life, a conflation that people without family histories of suicide make all the time.
On the general point my original parent was trying to make, I totally agree. People throwing away their lives over a business fuck-up is a waste.
I just wanted to search on the story and saw that point was made in the article I linked, and thought it was an interesting point to that specific case.
oh, well, that's alright then.
> HyperVM guy may have had a family history of suicide.
Seems so. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/09/lxlabs_funder_death/
But more than that, in his own words, he was a "man of excesses." Here is his archived blog (http://echoreply.us/ligesh.com/ligesh.com/about/index.html)
[0] http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/security/25559-hyperv...