Re:There is no WiFi allergy: newspapers misreport PR as science
by scott_s on Wednesday July 29, 2009 @01:04AM
(#729494)
Someone else in the thread provides an excellent reasoning why such a low amount of energy is unlikely to make a difference.
I say it's an extraordinary claim because if it were true, it would imply fundamental changes in our understanding of how our bodies work, most people suffer no ill-effects, and I previously knew that double-blind studies could not corroborate the claims.
By definition, any claim that changes our understanding of anything is extraordinary, and it requires supporting evidence.
I say it's an extraordinary claim because if it were true, it would imply fundamental changes in our understanding of how our bodies work, most people suffer no ill-effects, and I previously knew that double-blind studies could not corroborate the claims.
By definition, any claim that changes our understanding of anything is extraordinary, and it requires supporting evidence.