>Very few (if any) fancy and well typespeced books by major publishers have been made with LaTeX. I know, because I know that industry.
What do they use, then? (I'm actually pretty curious, because I am writing a dissertation that I currently build with LaTeX, but I find it much nicer to write in Org mode. I'm doing whatever I can to avoid a hard dependency on LaTeX for the backend, and to allow exporting to multiple formats.)
Why do they use whatever typesetting solution(s) they use? Does it actually produce better/nicer output than LaTeX (for non-math text)? Does it just have nicer syntax or friendlier error messages? What's the advantage?
Quark Xpress and Adobe inDesign are two I have seen being used. In the past Corel Ventura was wuite popular too.
> A not really maintained, relic of a program, [...]
I have to wonder if your average publisher would even know what to do with a book written in LaTeX.
Re:Neovim
by oatmeal_coffee on Saturday February 22, 2014 @02:34PM
(#7283246)
Any publisher that produces books with heavy math will know what to do with LaTeX, and if not then call a vendor that will know what to do with LaTeX.
Well, mostly math and science books. Very few (if any) fancy and well typespeced books by major publishers have been made with LaTeX. I know, because I know that industry. So, while TeX was once created to be a general typesetting solution, it has been relegated to something math and cs geeks use for their papers.
>And if you find LaTeX is so hard, there's always LyX...
A not really maintained, relic of a program, that tries too hard to work around the issues raised by a backend like LaTeX that wasn't really created with such GUI control in mind.