News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neovim by danieldk on Saturday February 22, 2014 @04:21AM (#7281528)
It is not slow, it runs in under a second on most documents I have authored.

It is slow. On my PhD thesis, it took more than one minute at some point, on an SSD. Not very convenient if you are tweaking figures and equations, and want to preview a change quickly.

Re:Neovim by orbifold on Saturday February 22, 2014 @10:32AM (#7282322)
Then you did it wrong. You should have just factored your thesis in multiple files, for example used one for each chapter.
Re:Neovim by nailer on Saturday February 22, 2014 @12:50PM (#7282831)
That sounds like a workaround.
Re:Neovim by timtadh on Saturday February 22, 2014 @01:15PM (#7282932)
Actually, it is a pretty useful feature. I break my documents up into multiple files and can compile pieces of them together for different audiences. Want an executive summary of my research just build the abstract + a summary. Want to review the literature with my advisor, build the just the literature review.

However, I will agree that using it to address slowness of a build process is just a hack.

Re:Neovim by scintill76 on Saturday February 22, 2014 @04:44PM (#7283756)
I suppose you would say splitting your C++ into separate source files is a "workaround" for slow compilation times, too? It could be, but both are probably good practice anyway.
Re:Neovim by nimish on Saturday February 22, 2014 @02:23PM (#7283207)
It is, but you have to remember latex is best thought of a programming language that outputs pdfs so splitting into multiple source files is useful, as is source control.
Re:Neovim by danieldk on Sunday February 23, 2014 @11:48AM (#7286465)
My thesis was split in multiple files.
Re:Neovim by nhaehnle on Saturday February 22, 2014 @05:59AM (#7281712)
I agree that that aspect of LaTeX sucks. That said, as a matter of exchanging practical hints: If you haven't yet heard of \includeonly, you should definitely check it out ;)