News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by Luc on Friday February 21, 2014 @02:02PM (#7278702)
> the resources currently available for would-be Erlang adopters require an unrealistic level of interest and time to get them over the hump.

The person who can't be bothered to even find 'Learn You Some Erlang' also won't have the motivation to learn Erlang. It does take effort, but there now are many good resources available (unlike the situation just a few years ago).

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by spoiler on Friday February 21, 2014 @02:43PM (#7278971)
I believe you missed the point. When I first heard about Go, I went to the official website and I was immediately presented with a few code examples. The go tour was fascinatingly good introductory material. Furthermore, the documentation and language specification are very concise, clear and full of examples.

What am I trying to say? Put effort into presenting your language and I will put effort into going through the material.

Give me two shit and that's how much interest you will get from me.

However, I put my own effort into finding more resources. I tried Erlang, it was OK, but I wasn't very comfortable working with the syntax. I've never needed any special feature in Erlang that I couldn't accomplish in another language.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by Luc on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:24PM (#7279178)
No, I get the point, but I don't agree with it, at least not to that extent.

> Put effort into presenting your language and I will put effort into going through the material. Give me two shit and that's how much interest you will get from me.

See, I really don't think it's worth courting people who have that attitude. If your motivation is _that_ low, it's probably not for you anyway. At this point, even people who don't have a real need for Erlang/OTP, but who still enjoy learning for the sake of learning, can find great introductory material.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by scott_s on Friday February 21, 2014 @04:02PM (#7279418)
Lots of people enjoy learning for the sake of learning, but there is an infinite amount of things out there for people to learn. If you don't spend some effort to convince people "Hey, this thing there is really worth learning!" then they won't - even if they are not lazy. No one - even non-lazy people - has the time to learn about everything.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by claystu on Saturday February 22, 2014 @02:30PM (#7283231)
> See, I really don't think it's worth courting people who have that attitude.

What attitude? Someone goes to a website out of curiosity, but it isn't very helpful so they leave. (Who hasn't done this?)

Erlang might be EXACTLY the thing they need, but on the subject of why Erlang isn't more popular--subpar marketing is more than relevant.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular? by gordonguthrie on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:38PM (#7279264)
The person who can't be bothered to find something they don't know exists. Seriously?