Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular?
by Guvante on Friday February 21, 2014 @01:13PM
(#7278383)
You misunderstand his point. He isn't saying that Erlang is a toy language, he is saying that documentation makes Erlang look like a toy language.
i.e. showing him how his thought was wrong doesn't change the fact that many other people will probably make a similar thoughts.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular?
by vertex-four on Friday February 21, 2014 @01:51PM
(#7278612)
No, I understood the OP's point, I just decided to point them towards a better resource in the case that they do want to learn more about it at some point. I agree that the Erlang site is utterly dreadful.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular?
by Guvante on Friday February 21, 2014 @06:39PM
(#7280203)
Fair enough, just misunderstood your tone, my apologies.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't Erlang more popular?
by gordonguthrie on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:34PM
(#7279230)
Yessum, it is indeedy...
It was actually designed to solve actual problems. Specifically, extremely high reliability in some of Ericsson's core networking gear.
I'd recommend Learn You Some Erlang[0] if you intend to look at it again. It explains the language, then OTP (the Open Telephony Platform - a framework for defining Erlang process trees and failure modes), then basic outside communication and disk storage.
[0] http://learnyousomeerlang.com/