News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by edj on Thursday February 20, 2014 @03:00PM (#7273166)
Duck duck is barely usable ... but they don't spy on you. The !g and !b commands make it my first choice.

I keep leaving DDG for the not-always-super-relevant results, and I keep coming back for the privacy, clean interface, and !bang syntax.

I love that using it means my searches are private by default. But the real killer feature is !bang. I find that it's faster to do a Google image search using DDG with "!gi" than to search in Google and then move my hand to the mouse and click "Images".

Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by joesb on Thursday February 20, 2014 @11:13PM (#7275404)
Why do people talk about this !bang syntax so much? I can do the same thing with search provider shortcut in my browser.

For example, after setting up once, I can press "Ctrl+L" then type "gi" then "Tab" and start typing my search keyword. I don't even have to first go to Google or DDG.

Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by ngpio on Friday February 21, 2014 @01:25AM (#7275703)
Because setting up a shortcut once for many hundreds[1] of sites is more demanding work than typing ! each time.

There's a bang for almost every site I frequent, and when a site changes its domain or search URI the bang is updated to reflect it almost immediately with no work on my end.

After a few weeks of acquainting myself with the bang system, I started to see web search from a completely different perspective. I think of a search engine now as less of an "everything index" and more of an "index of contextual searches". My mind, instead of just thinking "I'll google it", thinks "I'll choose a context for it".

Google is like a system-wide grep whose output is altered by advertising, and DDG w/ bangs is like a vast collection of commands piped into a grep.

[1] https://duckduckgo.com/bang.html