News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How The Guardian successfully moved its domain to theguar... by VBprogrammer on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @10:59AM (#7258767)
Or a hack which will never be removed from the code-base, depending on your point of view.

I'm intrigued as to why changing to relative domains wasn't possible. If nothing else pushing 'http://www.theguardian.com' out for every link adds to a lot of bytes up for a busy site.

Re:How The Guardian successfully moved its domain to theguar... by cbr on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @11:30AM (#7258995)

    pushing 'http://www.theguardian.com' out for every link
    adds to a lot of bytes up for a busy site
Fewer than you'd think after gzip compression:

    $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | wc -c
    223195
    $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | \
       sed s'~http://www.theguardian.com~~' | wc -c
    215473
    $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | \
       gzip | wc -c
    33783
    $ curl -s http://www.theguardian.com/us | \
       sed s'~http://www.theguardian.com~~' | gzip | wc -c
    33554
They have 7.7k of extra html due to repeating "http://www.theguardian.com" for every link, but gzip compressed this is only a difference of 229 bytes.