News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using pry in production by ufmace on Friday February 14, 2014 @09:14PM (#7242345)
That's pretty cool. What I'd really like to know, though, is if anybody knows how to drop into a pry-debugger debug session during a unit test.
Re:Using pry in production by snmaynard on Friday February 14, 2014 @11:17PM (#7242646)
You can use https://github.com/ConradIrwin/pry-rescue#rspec pry-rescues rspec integration to automatically fall into pry when a test fails
Re:Using pry in production by hopsoft on Saturday February 15, 2014 @02:19AM (#7243009)
I built a small testing framework with a pry workflow as one of it's goals. It's possible to run the tests in pry mode which drops you into a pry session on test failure. I've used it on several small libs & the test+pry workflow is quite nice. https://github.com/hopsoft/micro_test
Re:Using pry in production by MaxGabriel on Friday February 14, 2014 @10:53PM (#7242597)
Just binding.pry works for me in rspec. Does that not work for you?
Re:Using pry in production by ufmace on Saturday February 15, 2014 @12:22PM (#7244419)
Thanks, I'll give it a try, though I'm using Minitest. I haven't really tried much yet on that front; I mostly just got to the point of realizing that this issue I'm working on now is really going to be a pain to get figured out without a debugger.

For this project, I just switched, like a month or so ago, to an all-Vim workflow. I mostly feel more productive in it so far, but a real debugger is the one thing that I had been putting off figuring out.

Re:Using pry in production by mrinterweb on Saturday February 15, 2014 @03:52AM (#7243142)
That's what I was going to recommend. I use "binding.pry" in my specs frequently. Just be sure to take it out before you commit ;)