Re:"Marriage is for white people"
by plinkplonk on Saturday July 25, 2009 @09:17PM
(#723913)
" those that start each day looking for opportunities and those that start each day looking to the past. I'd rather be the second kind of person."
Did you mean "I'd rather be the first kind of person." ? The sentence seems to shift in meaning when you change that word, to one that fits the paragraph more.
Re:"Marriage is for white people"
by DanielBMarkham on Saturday July 25, 2009 @11:12PM
(#724012)
Brain fart. Doh!
Yes. You're right.
I'm in my 40s, which means that I never knew a society that wouldn't allow blacks to vote. I certainly had nothing to do with slavery. I used to find this identity politics justified, then amusing (as I thought through it some more), and now it's just feeble.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those that start each day looking for opportunities and those that start each day looking to the past. I'd rather be the second kind of person. So I don't discriminate based on color, won't put up with others who do, and am finished with considering race an interesting or important issue.
As an aside, there's a serious issue with segregating population based on skin color (as opposed to any other random collection of genes)for purposes of commentary -- it actually reinforces the idea that somehow people of one color are different than another. Of course we all know that patterns appear in the genetic pool, but using skin color as a predominant discriminating factor is, as best, misguided. At worst, it can cause the exact types of behavior we all agree is so bad.