-- one enforcing use of its currency
Interesting. From my point of view Bitcoin - is an agreement on protocol. We trust the idea and protocol to be secure.
What if someone changes this protocol and you won't be happy with these changes (and you can't control these changes now) - does it mean you were enforced to use it?
Bitcoin Foundation or some well-known economist or developer may be put out some reasons for some change and convince people to upgrade to new rules. But the ultimate decision is in hands of every individual user: miner, merchant or a regular consumer.
Is that assumption true? Or do people just blindly update whenever there's an update?
Of course, some people can upgrade blindly. But if in the middle of transition it turns out that some people are worse off, everyone will rush back to avoid wasting resources on blocks that are not 100% accepted.