News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by AnthonyMouse on Thursday February 13, 2014 @12:02AM (#7229573)
I think people are overly optimistic about the ability to endlessly increase the performance of wireless networks. The existing networks make fairly efficient use of the spectrum they're allocated. That means you really only have two options to make it go faster.

1) More spectrum. But it's massively in demand (read: expensive), nobody wants to give any up, and even if you had "all" the spectrum there are still practical physical limits about how much data you can transmit without using a wavelength that won't penetrate walls.

2) More towers that each use lower power. This is the one that can get you almost arbitrarily large amounts of wireless bandwidth, but it's also the one whose cost converges on the cost of building a new fiber optic network as the number of towers you need approaches the number of users you have.

Neither one of those is going to make for an inexpensive roll out of a wireless network capable of handling Netflix's video traffic to millions of customers simultaneously in the same city.

Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by redwall_hp on Thursday February 13, 2014 @03:37AM (#7230160)
3) Municipal fiber-optic lines that ISPs can lease access to in order to provide service to customers. Boom, no more monopolies.
Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by runako on Thursday February 13, 2014 @01:21PM (#7233054)
Worth noting that this is illegal to some extent in ~19 states. The broadband oligopoly already thought of this, and has been working to pre-empt it for a while.
Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by igravious on Thursday February 13, 2014 @04:50AM (#7230465)
You'll be wanting WSPs (waste service providers) to lease access to sewage pipes next. Where will it all end?
Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by Spooky23 on Thursday February 13, 2014 @12:28PM (#7232680)
The difference between the sewer and broadband is that the price of giving sewer district a monopoly is regulation as a public utility.

So if whomever runs your sewer decides that they will not accept solid waste anymore, there is a regulator who will prohibit that from happening.

In many states, the Public Service Commission or similar entity has lots of regulatory authority over cable television, landline and electric rates, but no authority over cellular or broadband. Shockingly, the utilities have invested nothing in the regulated markets for 20 years.

Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by lucian1900 on Thursday February 13, 2014 @06:03AM (#7230700)
That would also be a great idea.

Leasing infrastructure works great in lots of cases.

Re:Comcast Acquiring Time Warner Cable In All Stock Deal Wor... by toomuchtodo on Thursday February 13, 2014 @05:25PM (#7234943)
So get on it. Find your local city/state reps, tell them you want this, and do it.

Places all over the US have already done so, but someone has to show there is local demand.