Re:CandySwipe Open Letter to King regarding trademark
by wpietri on Wednesday February 12, 2014 @02:59PM
(#7226878)
The claim for the Apple marketplace was that it would be a better place, a well-tended garden. Better for consumers, better for vendors, and worth Apple taking a large slice of profits. So I think it's reasonable that developers are surprised.
Re:CandySwipe Open Letter to King regarding trademark
by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday February 12, 2014 @04:41PM
(#7227540)
Exactly. What is the point of the walled garden if it protects neither producers nor consumers?
Re:CandySwipe Open Letter to King regarding trademark
by 10feet on Wednesday February 12, 2014 @05:45PM
(#7227918)
How are the consumers in any way affected by this?
Re:CandySwipe Open Letter to King regarding trademark
by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday February 12, 2014 @07:21PM
(#7228496)
Less choice when all the independents die out, inferior products because unoriginality isn't punished, confusion over product differentiation leading to undesired purchases ... the consumer is getting screwed right, left, and center.
Re:CandySwipe Open Letter to King regarding trademark
by hayksaakian on Wednesday February 12, 2014 @03:00PM
(#7226890)
The issue with courts is that not only do you need to convince them that the copier is in the wrong, but also that apple/Google should be the ones to do something about it.
Honestly I can't believe you (and other) developers are surprised when this happens.
My company's web site was copy and pasted wholesale by a competitor, and we had to threaten legal action against them in order to get them to replace it. (Probably with someone else's.)