Re:Broken by design: systemd
by epsylon on Monday February 10, 2014 @07:59AM
(#7210720)
You have completely missed the point of the article.
So if not systemd, what? Debian's discussion of whether to adopt systemd or not basically devolved into a false dichotomy between systemd and upstart. And except among grumpy old luddites, keeping legacy sysvinit is not an attractive option. So despite all its flaws, is systemd still the best option?
No.
After which he proceeds to explain how to solve points 1, 2, and 3 by moving most tasks out of PID 1.
So if not systemd, what? Debian's discussion of whether to adopt systemd or not basically devolved into a false dichotomy between systemd and upstart. And except among grumpy old luddites, keeping legacy sysvinit is not an attractive option. So despite all its flaws, is systemd still the best option?
No.
After which he proceeds to explain how to solve points 1, 2, and 3 by moving most tasks out of PID 1.