Re:Distressed by Baby Controversy, AOL’s Armstrong Reverses ...
by chris_wot on Monday February 10, 2014 @06:09AM
(#7210309)
I respectfully disagree. The reason I thought it was unfeeling was because he said that "I have to wonder why, in a world with billions of people, we would spend a million dollars to keep just one human alive?"
It was the "we" part that got to me. We don't spend millions of dollars on every human, we (as a society) don't need to. But we do spend that on the few humans that it does cost millions to keep alive. There are a lot of research projects that costs millions of dollars to keep going, and often they find breakthroughs that influence other areas.
And I wasn't really disparaging him. He said himself that he thought it might sound unfeeling. To me, it did.
It was the "we" part that got to me. We don't spend millions of dollars on every human, we (as a society) don't need to. But we do spend that on the few humans that it does cost millions to keep alive. There are a lot of research projects that costs millions of dollars to keep going, and often they find breakthroughs that influence other areas.
And I wasn't really disparaging him. He said himself that he thought it might sound unfeeling. To me, it did.