News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Distressed by Baby Controversy, AOL’s Armstrong Reverses ... by w1ntermute on Saturday February 08, 2014 @11:31PM (#7204381)
Right, it might make sense to save an infant (although it makes a lot more economic sense for women who cannot have healthy children to adopt instead).

But the bigger question is why we spend so much money to prolong the life of someone who's in their 70s or 80s (and often suffering and in pain) for another couple of years, or even just months.

Re:Distressed by Baby Controversy, AOL’s Armstrong Reverses ... by ars on Sunday February 09, 2014 @12:43AM (#7204536)
That's part of what makes us human and not computers or animals. Some things are not rational yet we do them anyway.
Re:Distressed by Baby Controversy, AOL’s Armstrong Reverses ... by w1ntermute on Monday February 10, 2014 @12:56AM (#7209394)
Human folly has lead to a variety of illogical practices, many of which have been stamped out over the centuries. There's no reason the same couldn't be done here.