News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio by enqk on Thursday July 23, 2009 @12:11PM (#719808)
Audacity is clunky but gets the work done when it comes to simple editing. Not really indeed very good for a musician since it misses useful realtime feedback on effects, but for a Dad looking to record / edit / convert his vinyls into mp3s it works perfectly.

As for why you'd want to have low latency on a sample editing software, I do not really understand why. Unless you want to record and process effect automations. For that purpose, why not use something more like an audio sequencer? (Reaper -- pretty cheap -- or Logic Audio, Cubase, Ableton Live)

As for exports, Audacity supports ogg, mp3 and flac, which is pretty good. But no direct burn operation.

Who burns CDs nowadays, though?

In summary I think the only crime that Audacity commits is to look and sell itself as more advanced than what it really is: a simple sample editing software. So bad marketing and an incorrect apparent focus on musicians.

Re:Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio by shin_lao on Thursday July 23, 2009 @12:52PM (#719902)
Low latency is interesting when you're tweaking the VST in real time and want to see how it affects your recording. With enough CPU power and a good audio card, this is doable even with a complex stack of effects.

I guess it could also be important when using external processors.

Re:Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio by enqk on Friday July 24, 2009 @05:41AM (#721207)
Yet this has nothing to do with low latency. You can have a decent realtime preview with ~120ms latency, which I use as a limit for instantaneousness.

Low-latency is good for performance, as in, for performing live. And that's it (Then again ask any church organ player about latency.. He has ton of it)