Re:Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio
by shin_lao on Thursday July 23, 2009 @12:52PM
(#719902)
Low latency is interesting when you're tweaking the VST in real time and want to see how it affects your recording. With enough CPU power and a good audio card, this is doable even with a complex stack of effects.
I guess it could also be important when using external processors.
Re:Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio
by enqk on Friday July 24, 2009 @05:41AM
(#721207)
Yet this has nothing to do with low latency. You can have a decent realtime preview with ~120ms latency, which I use as a limit for instantaneousness.
Low-latency is good for performance, as in, for performing live. And that's it (Then again ask any church organ player about latency.. He has ton of it)
As for why you'd want to have low latency on a sample editing software, I do not really understand why. Unless you want to record and process effect automations. For that purpose, why not use something more like an audio sequencer? (Reaper -- pretty cheap -- or Logic Audio, Cubase, Ableton Live)
As for exports, Audacity supports ogg, mp3 and flac, which is pretty good. But no direct burn operation.
Who burns CDs nowadays, though?
In summary I think the only crime that Audacity commits is to look and sell itself as more advanced than what it really is: a simple sample editing software. So bad marketing and an incorrect apparent focus on musicians.