News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tim Berners-Lee: We need to re-decentralise the web by GrinningFool on Thursday February 06, 2014 @01:37PM (#7192066)
Doesn't that introduce the reverse problem though?

That makes someone else's content depend on the availability of your content - in the example of comments, the context and any intermediate replies can be lost if you stop hosting them. Leaving not a record of a conversation behind, but only indecipherable fragments.

A quick scan through the page at the link posted also seems to indicate the protocol depends a lot on content providers being well behaved. I'm assuming that somewhere in there there is handling for when content simply goes away with notification?

Re:Tim Berners-Lee: We need to re-decentralise the web by edoloughlin on Thursday February 06, 2014 @02:07PM (#7192248)
the protocol depends a lot on content providers being well behaved

I think this is true of existing content, except there are much fewer content providers and there's no protocol.

Re:Tim Berners-Lee: We need to re-decentralise the web by pekk on Thursday February 06, 2014 @02:03PM (#7192224)
Why can't your blog periodically verify its links? It seems obvious that you can't depend on notifications that something is no longer available