Re:Wikipedia May Be a Font of Facts, but It’s a Desert for P...
by timwiseman on Monday July 20, 2009 @03:52PM
(#715038)
But this one was insulting. It clearly portrayed the facts with limited judgment. At least as I read it, it made the "prominent personalities" that did not supply properly licensed photos as the source of the issue, if it is a real issue.
At least as I understood it, it was quite neutral to wikipedia itself.
At least as I understood it, it was quite neutral to wikipedia itself.