Re:Patch's new owner lays off staff in 1:39 conference call
by JonnieCache on Wednesday January 29, 2014 @03:38PM
(#7146665)
What was the context there? Was abel part of the group being fired in the call? Or was he fired on the spot with that remark?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Patch's new owner lays off staff in 1:39 conference call
by wlll on Wednesday January 29, 2014 @03:45PM
(#7146717)
It seems that Abel was part of Patch and Tim Armstrong is CEO of AOL. This second call was from some time last year and not related to the OPs link other than it's the same set of companies, and another dubious action made on a conference call.
Re:Patch's new owner lays off staff in 1:39 conference call
by JonnieCache on Wednesday January 29, 2014 @03:46PM
(#7146726)
I see that, let me rephrase: was abel being fired anyway, or was he literally fired for the impudence of taking a photo?
I guess it must be the latter, or the clip wouldn't be so interesting.
Re:Patch's new owner lays off staff in 1:39 conference call
by dsl on Wednesday January 29, 2014 @04:51PM
(#7147273)
He was fucking around and not taking the meeting seriously.
If I was a CEO trying to get the house in order and at that very second Instagram is more important to you... you're gonna have a bad time.
Re:Patch's new owner lays off staff in 1:39 conference call
by reqres on Wednesday January 29, 2014 @06:14PM
(#7147822)
I don't think anyone is debating whether taking a photo during a serious meeting is a good idea
It's wrong to unnecessarily fire someone in front of their colleagues. It destroys morale and it's essentially a form of public humiliation. A better response would have been to ask to put the camera away and remind people it's a serious meeting.