News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Most expensive javascript ever. Parent comment

Re:Most expensive javascript ever by lucumo on Monday July 20, 2009 @11:30AM (#714533)
> Seems to me that it's mistitled. It's only an expensive bug if they lost the contract, and the article doesn't say that.

It does. FTA:

> This single statement, apparently written by some sub-contractor they had outsourced admin interface programming to, cost them millions of NOK in lost sales.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Most expensive javascript ever by joezydeco on Monday July 20, 2009 @12:02PM (#714588)
It's also not a bug. The article never titled it a bug.
[ Parent | on HN ]